Your Artist's Path · blog

Past lives and hypnotic regressions: what is known, what is not known, and what most people invent

"I remember being Egyptian in 1200 BC." It's the promise of past life regressions: under hypnosis, you access memories from previous lives. Brian Weiss sold millions of books on this. The reality: Hypnosis does not recover objective memories — it constructs them. What comes out in regressions is real as experience, not as evidence. Here's what to know before spending €200 on a session.

What exactly is hypnosis and what does it do to the brain?

Hypnosis is a state of focused concentration with high suggestibility. It's not magic or a dream. It is a real psychological state, documented neurologically.

Under hypnosis: the activity of the prefrontal cortex (critical judgment) decreases, sensory and emotional activity increases, the filter between conscious and unconscious is reduced. The subject is still conscious but more permeable to suggestions.

This makes it useful for some clinical treatments: pain control, specific phobias, smoking cessation. The American Psychological Association recognizes it as a legitimate auxiliary tool in professional hands.

But: High suggestibility means that the information that comes out under hypnosis is not necessarily real. It is information constructed in collaboration between hypnotist and subject.

What did Elizabeth Loftus demonstrate about memories under hypnosis?

Elizabeth Loftus, a psychologist at UC Irvine, spent decades studying the malleability of memory. Their findings changed the legal and scientific understanding of memory.

Loftus showed that it is relatively easy implant completely false memories in hypnotized (and sometimes even awake) people by repeated suggestion. Subjects came to "vividly remember" getting lost in a shopping center at age 5 — an event that never occurred.

Implanted memories have details, emotion, sensoriality. For the subject they are indistinguishable from real memories. This has serious implications: testimonies under hypnosis are not admissible as evidence in courts in many countries for this reason.

The application to regressions: what the subject "remembers" as a past life may be brain construction stimulated by the hypnotist's suggestions, not access to objective memory.

Who is Brian Weiss and why is he controversial?

Brian Weiss He is an American psychiatrist, trained at Yale and Columbia. Your credentials are legitimate. In the 1980s, during therapy with a patient under hypnosis, she spontaneously "remembered" past lives. Weiss, who was skeptical, observed that working with those memories improved symptoms that conventional therapy had not resolved.

Public Many Lives, Many Masters (1988) — sold millions, launched an industry. His thesis: regressions access real memories of past lives, and working with them has a therapeutic effect.

The academic criticism: the therapeutic effect can be real (any narrative the patient engages with can have an effect) without the regressions being evidence of past lives. Therapeutic efficacy does not prove metaphysical veracity.

Weiss has been criticized by psychologists and psychiatrists for making the jump from "it works" to "it's real." It is an epistemological leap that its evidence does not support.

Do regressions have therapeutic value?

Probably yes, in a limited sense. Not for the reasons Weiss says.

What happens in a regression: the brain constructs a symbolic narrative that externalizes unconscious emotional material. "Remembering" having been a Roman soldier dying in battle may be, in the Jungian sense, a symbolic expression of some current feeling of defeat.

Working with this narrative can have a therapeutic effect similar to other forms of symbolic work (art therapy, therapeutic narrative, sand play). It is processing unconscious material via symbol.

The difference with the literal interpretation: If you think you remember real past lives, you can make problematic causal attributions ("my fear of crowds comes from being crushed to death in Rome"). If you understand that it is a symbolic construction, you work with the metaphor without reifying it.

What are the risks of a poorly done regression?

They are not minors.

Documented risks:

Are there legitimate regressions?

It depends on what you mean by legitimate.

If "legitimate" means made by professionals with honest framework: yes, there are. A therapist who offers regressions as a symbolic work technique (without reifying past lives), with a broad therapeutic framework, can use the tool with positive effect.

If "legitimate" means evidence of real past lives: No. Hypnosis is not a window to objective memory, whether from this life or previous ones.

The distinction matters. Looking for a therapist who is clear about the symbolic nature of the process is very different from looking for someone who claims to access the "truth" of your past lives. The former can help; the latter sold pseudoscience.

How to distinguish between good and bad regression therapist?

Five signs of quality and five warning signs.

Positive signs:

Warning signs

If you find these signs, better go somewhere else.

Warning signs:

Is there a more solid alternative for the same objective?

If what you are looking for is deep work with unconscious material, there are alternatives with better support.

Jungian psychoanalysis: work with dreams and archetypes, based on established methodology.

Narrative therapy (Michael White): I work with the stories you tell yourself about your life.

Art therapy or sandplay therapy: access to unconscious material via non-verbal symbolic expression.

EMDR: for specific trauma, robust evidence.

Cameron's Morning Pages: access to unconscious material via free writing. Slow but sure and sustainable.

These techniques give access to deep material without invoking unprovable metaphysics and with a more solid therapeutic framework.

Frequently asked questions

Can regressions cure physical illnesses?

There is no evidence. They can reduce anxiety associated with symptoms and improve adherence to treatment. As a substitute for medicine, they do not work.

Is Brian Weiss a real psychiatrist?

Yes, legitimate training at Yale and Columbia. His credibility as a popularizer of the concept derives in part from his credentials — but credentials do not validate every claim he makes.

Why so much historical detail in the regressions?

Reconstructive memory produces detail from environmental information (movies watched, books read, photographs). The brain does not invent from scratch — it recomposes.

Can regressions "worse" existing trauma?

Yes. Especially in people with previous unstabilized trauma. That is why a broad therapeutic framework is important, not an isolated session.

Do collective regressions in workshops work?

Especially problematic. Without individualized attention, risk of retraumatization. And group suggestion amplifies the construction of false memories.

Does it work for unexplained phobias?

In some cases yes (therapeutic effect of narrative). But techniques like EMDR and exposure have better evidence for phobias.

Remembering one's own death in regression?

Common in sessions. As a symbolic experience it can be useful; as metaphysical evidence, no.

Are past lives and reincarnation the same thing?

Connected but different. Reincarnation is the doctrine; Past lives is the affirmation of remembering them. You can believe in reincarnation without claiming experiential access to previous lives.

Ready to start your journey?

The complete course, all 12 weeks, totally free. Morning pages, appointment with the artist, weekly exercises and community.

Get started for free →